<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Coding in the cloud</title>
	<atom:link href="http://joeriks.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://joeriks.com</link>
	<description>Jonas Eriksson (@joeriks) about web programming</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:42:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A first look at SlickGrid with read, insert and update (in WebMatrix) by slickgrid &#171; TechnoBuzz</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2011/07/03/a-first-look-at-slickgrid-with-read-and-update-in-webmatrix/#comment-1725</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[slickgrid &#171; TechnoBuzz]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Jun 2013 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.wordpress.com/?p=1111#comment-1725</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] http://joeriks.com/2011/07/03/a-first-look-at-slickgrid-with-read-and-update-in-webmatrix/ [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] <a href="http://joeriks.com/2011/07/03/a-first-look-at-slickgrid-with-read-and-update-in-webmatrix/" rel="nofollow">http://joeriks.com/2011/07/03/a-first-look-at-slickgrid-with-read-and-update-in-webmatrix/</a> [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on From zero to a live installation of Umbraco in 30 minutes (for beginners) by Paul Goodwin</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2011/03/19/from-zero-to-a-live-installation-of-umbraco-in-30-minutes-for-beginners/#comment-1463</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Goodwin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 08:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.wordpress.com/?p=901#comment-1463</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good post Joeriks,

It&#039;s great to see more people trying to encourage people to install and try Umbraco. To try and encourage this, I decided to do the same and write my own tutorial site for non technical users (www.uquickstart.com). Keep up the good work, together we can all make Umbraco great...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good post Joeriks,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s great to see more people trying to encourage people to install and try Umbraco. To try and encourage this, I decided to do the same and write my own tutorial site for non technical users (www.uquickstart.com). Keep up the good work, together we can all make Umbraco great&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on A MVC-ish approach to WebMatrix (WebPages) by Jacinto Corning</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2011/01/26/a-mvc-ish-approach-to-webmatrix-webpages/#comment-1459</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacinto Corning]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 02:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.wordpress.com/?p=646#comment-1459</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is great, as well as the content!. Thanks For Your article about A MVC-ish approach to WebMatrix (WebPages)  &#124;  Coding in the cloud .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, wonderful blog layout! How long have you been blogging for? you made blogging look easy. The overall look of your site is great, as well as the content!. Thanks For Your article about A MVC-ish approach to WebMatrix (WebPages)  |  Coding in the cloud .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on CORS BasicAuth on ServiceStack with custom authentication by Tom Krueger (@tomkrueger)</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/01/12/cors-basicauth-on-servicestack-with-custom-authentication/#comment-1457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Krueger (@tomkrueger)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 May 2013 01:27:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=2172#comment-1457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Excellent write-up.  Thank You!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent write-up.  Thank You!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor? by Jeroen Breuer (@j_breuer)</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/05/22/the-right-amount-of-separation-of-concerns-in-umbraco-razor/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen Breuer (@j_breuer)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 14:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=3900#comment-1427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. If I need to show child nodes that logic is done in the controller and it returns a Viewmodel to the strongly typed view to display it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. If I need to show child nodes that logic is done in the controller and it returns a Viewmodel to the strongly typed view to display it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor? by joeriks</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/05/22/the-right-amount-of-separation-of-concerns-in-umbraco-razor/#comment-1425</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joeriks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 12:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=3900#comment-1425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So you&#039;d put the content query in the Controller? And create a Viewmodel + a strongly typed view?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you&#8217;d put the content query in the Controller? And create a Viewmodel + a strongly typed view?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor? by Jeroen Breuer (@j_breuer)</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/05/22/the-right-amount-of-separation-of-concerns-in-umbraco-razor/#comment-1424</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeroen Breuer (@j_breuer)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2013 12:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=3900#comment-1424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I prefer how it&#039;s done here: http://ndesoft.dk/2013/05/25/how-to-create-a-real-mvc-app-using-umbraco/. I&#039;m doing it slightly different, but I like it that I&#039;m able to put all my logic into controllers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I prefer how it&#8217;s done here: <a href="http://ndesoft.dk/2013/05/25/how-to-create-a-real-mvc-app-using-umbraco/" rel="nofollow">http://ndesoft.dk/2013/05/25/how-to-create-a-real-mvc-app-using-umbraco/</a>. I&#8217;m doing it slightly different, but I like it that I&#8217;m able to put all my logic into controllers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor? by How to create a real MVC app using umbraco &#124; NDesoft</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/05/22/the-right-amount-of-separation-of-concerns-in-umbraco-razor/#comment-1401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[How to create a real MVC app using umbraco &#124; NDesoft]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 14:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=3900#comment-1401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] are many ways to help these poor frontenders, as this excellent post, The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor?, describes, we can help a lot by separating our logic from our presentation without making a big [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] are many ways to help these poor frontenders, as this excellent post, The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor?, describes, we can help a lot by separating our logic from our presentation without making a big [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor? by joeriks</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/05/22/the-right-amount-of-separation-of-concerns-in-umbraco-razor/#comment-1399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[joeriks]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 07:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=3900#comment-1399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Glad to here you like it Laurence, I&#039;m actually in the middle of moving a lot of XSLT to Razor :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glad to here you like it Laurence, I&#8217;m actually in the middle of moving a lot of XSLT to Razor <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The right amount of separation of concerns in Umbraco Razor? by Separating html and logic in Razor (WebPages or Umbraco macroscript) &#124; Coding in the cloud</title>
		<link>http://joeriks.com/2013/05/22/the-right-amount-of-separation-of-concerns-in-umbraco-razor/#comment-1397</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Separating html and logic in Razor (WebPages or Umbraco macroscript) &#124; Coding in the cloud]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 04:16:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://joeriks.com/?p=3900#comment-1397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Update: I recommend do not use this too extensively The &#8220;functions&#8221; approach is nice, but also consider the simpler way just to have an initialization section in the top of the script &#8211; still separating C# from actual view. See this post for an example. [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Update: I recommend do not use this too extensively The &#8220;functions&#8221; approach is nice, but also consider the simpler way just to have an initialization section in the top of the script &#8211; still separating C# from actual view. See this post for an example. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
